Shadow AI security risks: what Australian businesses need to know

Earlier this year, an Australian company discovered its legal team had been using ChatGPT to draft sensitive contract clauses. While the productivity gains may have been impressive, every confidential clause, client name and commercial term had been processed through a public AI platform with no enterprise protections.

This scenario isn't hypothetical nor isolated. Across Australia, employees are embracing AI to solve real business challenges, often achieving remarkable results. However, this grassroots adoption is creating a parallel economy of AI usage that operates completely outside traditional IT oversight, exposing organisations to risks they are unaware of.

This phenomenon is known as “shadow AI” -  when employees use AI tools independently of IT-approved platforms, often without awareness of data security, privacy, or compliance requirements. In fact, recent Australian research reveals a startling reality: between 21% to 27% of workers are using AI tools “in the shadows”, with many sharing confidential data through unsecured platforms. 

Understanding shadow AI requires recognising it's not about blocking innovation, but managing the hidden financial and security implications that can devastate unprepared organisations.

The financial reality of shadow AI breaches

The financial consequences of unmanaged shadow AI are significant. Organisations with high levels of shadow AI face breach costs that are $670,000 higher than those with minimal shadow AI usage.

Already, 1 in 5 organisations have experienced breaches directly attributed to Shadow AI, yet 97% of affected organisations lacked proper, or in some cases, any AI access controls. 

The ripple effects extend beyond immediate costs. Shadow AI breaches typically result in more extensive data compromise, with 65% involving personal identifiable information and 40% exposing intellectual property. This widespread exposure occurs because even a single unmonitored AI system can lead to exposure across multiple environments.

Looking ahead, the risks are set to intensify. Gartner predicts that 40% of AI data breaches will arise from cross-border GenAI misuse by 2027, highlighting how shadow AI usage across international platforms creates additional regulatory and jurisdictional complications for Australian businesses.

Real-world risks hiding in plain sight

The specific risks of shadow AI often remain invisible until it's too late. Industry analysis reveals several critical vulnerability areas:

  • Data exposure through public platforms: The most significant risk lies in employees unknowingly sharing sensitive business information with public AI platforms that lack enterprise-level protections. When staff upload customer lists, financial data, or strategic documents to consumer AI tools, this information can become part of the platform's training data or be inadvertently exposed to other users. 
  • Browser plugin vulnerabilities: AI browser extensions and plugins often operate with extensive permissions, creating potential backdoors into corporate systems. These tools can access browsing history, form data and documents, yet many employees install them without considering security implications.
  • Lack of audit trails: Unlike enterprise AI solutions, shadow AI tools provide no visibility into who accessed what data, when it was processed or how outputs were generated. This creates compliance nightmares and makes incident response nearly impossible.

The challenge for Australian businesses lies in harnessing the efficiency gains AI offers while managing the inherent risks. Simply banning AI tools drives usage underground and stifles legitimate productivity gains. The solution requires a more nuanced approach.

Implementation strategies that reduce risk

  • Establish a comprehensive AI usage policy: The foundation of managing shadow AI starts with a clear, enforceable policy that defines acceptable AI use across your organisation. This policy should specify which AI tools are approved, what types of data can be processed, approval workflows for new tools, and consequences for violations. Your policy becomes the mandate that enables all other risk management strategies.
  • Focus on governance: The foundation of AI security lies in robust governance, including data classification and access controls. Implement systems that automatically identify sensitive information before it reaches AI models, ensuring employees understand what data can and cannot be processed through AI tools.
  • Implement data loss prevention (DLP) with AI: Modern DLP solutions can identify when sensitive data is being transmitted to AI platforms and either block the transmission or require additional approval workflows. This technical safeguard operates regardless of employee awareness or compliance.
  • Develop targeted awareness and training programs: Effective shadow AI management starts with education. Focus training on department-specific use cases, teaching employees how to develop effective prompts while understanding security boundaries. Regular workshops should address both the productivity potential and the hidden risks of unauthorised AI usage.
  • Deploy AI discovery and monitoring tools: Implement specialised software that can identify AI tool usage across your network, including browser-based applications and cloud services. These tools provide real-time visibility into shadow AI activities and can automatically flag high-risk behaviours like sensitive data uploads.
  • Create an internal AI marketplace: Rather than restricting access, establish an approved catalogue of AI tools that meet your security standards. This "AI app store" approach gives employees legitimate alternatives while maintaining control over data exposure and compliance requirements.
  • Conduct regular AI security assessments: Schedule regular reviews to identify new shadow AI tools, assess their risk profiles and update governance frameworks accordingly. The AI landscape evolves rapidly, making static policies ineffective over time.

Organisations that successfully manage shadow AI gain significant competitive advantages. They capture the productivity benefits of AI innovation while maintaining security and compliance standards. This balanced approach enables faster decision-making, improved customer service and enhanced operational efficiency.

Australian businesses have the opportunity to lead in the responsible adoption of AI. The key is to treat shadow AI not as a problem to eliminate, but as an opportunity to build better, safer and more competitive operations.

Ready to make smarter decisions about AI? This AI implementation guide helps you align technology with strategy, so you can start your AI journey with expert-backed confidence.

 

Share this

Related posts

Shadow AI security risks: what Australian businesses need to know

Read time 8 mins

Earlier this year, an Australian company discovered its legal team had been using ChatGPT to draft sensitive contract clauses.false Read More

Comprehensive AI risk management: Protecting your business

Read time 7 mins

Your organisation is likely already using AI in some capacity, from customer service chatbots to data analytics platforms. Butfalse Read More

How to choose between custom AI or off-the-shelf AI

Read time 11 mins

The AI implementation decision that keeps IT leaders awake at night isn't about functionality or cost - it's about security. Takefalse Read More

AI training for business: prevent costly security mistakes

Read time 8 mins

The promise of AI productivity gains is compelling, but without proper training, organisations often discover that untrainedfalse Read More